State v. Scott
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Brown, J.
Appellant Scott herein challenges the Court of Appeals’ affirmance of the kidnapping and extortion convictions, and its reversal and remand of the aggravated murder conviction. The state has separately appealed this reversal and remand. We consolidate these appeals and discuss appellant’s objections first.
I
Appellant contends, in his first proposition of law, that he is entitled to a discharge due to the state’s failure to comply with the speedy trial provisions, R. C. 2945.71 et seq. As herein applied, the speedy trial provisions effectively require that a felon incarcerated on a pending…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- State v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Bradshaw v. StumpfSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Douglas Coley v. Margaret BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- State v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1998
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.