Legal Opinion

State v. Kyllo

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 2009No. 81164-4PublishedCited by 261 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

¶1 — The defendant maintains that trial counsel was ineffective because counsel misstated the law on self-defense in an instruction counsel proposed that was given to the jury and in statements made during closing argument about Kenneth Kyllo’s self-defense claim. We agree and accordingly reverse Mr. Kyllo’s conviction for second degree assault. We remand for retrial.

FACTS

¶2 On June 12, 2004, while an inmate at the Cowlitz County Jail on other charges, defendant Kenneth Kyllo was involved in a fight with another inmate, Robert Mickens. Witnesses presented conflicting testimony about how the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Yarborough v. GentrySupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by261 opinions

  1. State v. GrierWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. GrierWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. RafayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of Yung-Cheng TsaiWashington Supreme Court · 2015

256 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API