United States v. One Hundred Thirty-nine Gambling Devices
District Court, E.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
PLATT, District Judge.
Two li'bel suits have been consolidated for trial and decision by this court. The libels allege that special agents oif the Federal Bureau of Investigation seized 139 gambling devices together with material *24parts therefor in one case and 496 gambling devices along with parts in the other case; that all of the machines, commonly known as slot machines, were seized in East St. Louis, St. Clair County, Illinois. The government seeks to condemn these machines and parts for the reason that they were possessed and used at the places set forth in the libels by persons who were…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe Coach, Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- McVeigh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Bobel v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Frost v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- United States v. AndradeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Diaz v. Allstate Northbrook Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023
- Starrett v. Midwest CityCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962
- Starrett v. Midwest CityCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962