Legal Opinion

Stoeco Development, Ltd. v. Department of the Army Corps of Engineers of the United States

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 14, 1992No. Civ. 88-0054 (WGB)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BASSLER, District Judge:

Plaintiffs Stoeco Development, Ltd., Stainton-Burrell Development, Ltd., the Shore Memorial Hospital and the Pennington School (“Stoeco”) move for a plenary hearing on the issue of whether the lands they are developing are “wetlands” within the meaning of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq., and 33 C.F.R. § 328.3(b). Defendant Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, (“Corps”) cross-moves for partial summary judgment on the issue of the Stoeco’s liability for violating 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. For the following reasons, the Corps’ motion is denied;…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. MEYER, Joseph W., Appellant v. RIEGEL PRODUCTS CORPORATION and James River Corporation of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. American Canoe Ass'n v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
  2. Orange Environment, Inc. v. County of OrangeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  3. Matter of Stoeco Development, Ltd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API