Stoeco Development, Ltd. v. Department of the Army Corps of Engineers of the United States
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BASSLER, District Judge:
Plaintiffs Stoeco Development, Ltd., Stainton-Burrell Development, Ltd., the Shore Memorial Hospital and the Pennington School (“Stoeco”) move for a plenary hearing on the issue of whether the lands they are developing are “wetlands” within the meaning of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq., and 33 C.F.R. § 328.3(b). Defendant Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, (“Corps”) cross-moves for partial summary judgment on the issue of the Stoeco’s liability for violating 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. For the following reasons, the Corps’ motion is denied;…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- MEYER, Joseph W., Appellant v. RIEGEL PRODUCTS CORPORATION and James River Corporation of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- American Canoe Ass'n v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
- Orange Environment, Inc. v. County of OrangeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Matter of Stoeco Development, Ltd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993