Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Matter of Stoeco Development, Ltd.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 8, 1993PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

262 N.J. Super. 326 (1993)

621 A.2d 29

IN THE MATTER OF STOECO DEVELOPMENT, LTD. AND STAINTON-BURRELL DEVELOPMENT, LTD.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted January 12, 1993.

Decided February 8, 1993.

Before Judges MICHELS, BILDER and BAIME.

Ford & Flower and Levin & Hluchan, attorneys for appellants (Richard M. Hluchan, of counsel; Terrie-Anne Duda, on the brief).

Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General, attorney for respondent (Mary C. Jacobson and John M. Van Dalen, Senior Deputy Attorneys General, of counsel; Howard Geduldig, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).

The opinion…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. City of Hackensack v. WinnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  2. Abbott v. BurkeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. Borough of Matawan v. Monmouth County Board of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
  4. Abbott v. BurkeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  5. Swede v. City of CliftonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bouie v. DEPT. OF COMMUNITYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  2. Local 518, New Jersey State Motor Vehicle Employees Union v. Division of Motor VehiclesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  3. Ortiz v. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  4. Rumana v. County of PassaicNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
  5. Ortiz v. New Jersey Department of CorrectionsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API