Richardson v. Quik Trip Corp.
District Court, S.D. Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
RULING AND ORDER
STEWART, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff brought this action against the defendant, his employer, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. [Title VII] alleging that his discharge for violation of defendants “no-beard policy” constituted racial discrimination because the policy has a disparate impact on black males. Plaintiff alleges that many black males, including himself, suffer from pseudofolliculitis barbae [PFB], which can be put into remission only by growing a beard at least one-quarter of an inch long. This action came to trial on April 16,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Dothard v. RawlinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Connecticut v. TealSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stender v. Lucky Stores, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1992
- Eatman v. United Parcel ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Johnson v. Memphis Police DepartmentDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1989