Legal Opinion
Eatman v. United Parcel Service
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 31, 2002No. 99 Civ. 9523PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
STEIN, District Judge.
Charles D. Eatman brings this employment discrimination action against United Parcel Service (“UPS”) pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”). UPS now moves pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 for summary judgment in its favor on the ground that there is no genuine issue of material fact that could enable a reasonable jury to conclude that UPS discriminated against Eatman, a former UPS package car driver, because of his race, his religion, or in retaliation for his having complained to UPS about racial and…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Catastrophe Management SolutionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- Weber v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Miller v. Safeway, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Equal Opprtunity Employment Commission v. United Health Programs of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- McNeil v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.