Legal Opinion
Stender v. Lucky Stores, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 18, 1992No. C-88-1467 MHPPublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
PATEL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have brought this class action against Lucky Stores, Inc. on behalf of Black and female employees working in retail stores within Lucky’s Northern California Food Division. Plaintiffs allege discrimination on the basis of race and sex in initial job placement, allocation of work hours, movement of part-time employees to full-time positions, and promotions. Claims are brought pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; 42 U.S.C. § 1981; and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act,…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- McClain v. Lufkin Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
- Jenson v. Eveleth Taconite Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
- Community Hospital v. FailSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.