Legal Opinion

In Re Lamb

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 1923No. Crim. No. 929PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

This is a habeas corpus proceeding wherein the petitioner seeks his discharge from imprisonment under a warrant of arrest issued on a complaint against him in the justice’s court. The complaint attempts to charge him with a violation of the- Corporate Securities Act. The ground of his application is that the pleading does not charge him with a public offense.

The pertinent provisions of the Corporate Securities Act (Stats. 1917, p. 673, amended 1919, p. 231, 1921, pp. 1008, 1114) are the following: Section 2 defines certain of the words and phrases used throughout the act. Subdivision 3 of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In re Estate of WalkerlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Hospes v. Northwestern Manuf'g & Car Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. In Re GirardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. People v. BranderIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Bay Biscayne Co. v. BaileSupreme Court of Florida · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. McCallaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  2. Del Costello v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. Cooper v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  4. Braud v. Stokes (In Re Stokes)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 1992
  5. People v. MainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API