In Re Lamb
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.
This is a habeas corpus proceeding wherein the petitioner seeks his discharge from imprisonment under a warrant of arrest issued on a complaint against him in the justice’s court. The complaint attempts to charge him with a violation of the- Corporate Securities Act. The ground of his application is that the pleading does not charge him with a public offense.
The pertinent provisions of the Corporate Securities Act (Stats. 1917, p. 673, amended 1919, p. 231, 1921, pp. 1008, 1114) are the following: Section 2 defines certain of the words and phrases used throughout the act. Subdivision 3 of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In re Estate of WalkerlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Hospes v. Northwestern Manuf'g & Car Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- In Re GirardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- People v. BranderIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
- Bay Biscayne Co. v. BaileSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. McCallaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Del Costello v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Cooper v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Braud v. Stokes (In Re Stokes)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 1992
- People v. MainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.