Legal Opinion

Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. Kercheval

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1861PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from tbe Decatur Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

This was an action brought in the Court of Common Pleas by Kercheval, against the railroad company, to recover the value of three horses killed by the cars of the defendant upon her railroad track, the road not being fenced. The action was based upon the statute of 1853, making railroad companies liable, without negligence, for stock killed or injured by the locomotive, &c. of the company, unless the road is properly fenced, and the act amendatory thereof, approved March 4, 1859. There is no charge, or proof, of negligence on the part of the company. It was alleged and proven that three…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. KinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Madison & Indianapolis Railroad v. WhiteneckIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Andrews v. RussellIndiana Supreme Court · 1845
  4. Newcastle & Richmond Railroad v. Peru & Indianapolis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1852
  5. President of the Peru v. BradshawIndiana Supreme Court · 1855

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hockett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. East Saginaw Manufacturing Co. v. City of East SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Shoemaker v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Kansas Pacific Rly. Co. v. MowerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  5. Indianapolis & Madison Railroad v. SolomonIndiana Supreme Court · 1864

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API