Legal Opinion

Newcastle & Richmond Railroad v. Peru & Indianapolis Railroad

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1852PublishedCited by 20 opinions

APPEAL from the Tipton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

The Peru and Indianapolis Railroad Com*465pany filed a bill in the Howard Circuit Court against the Newcastle and Richmond Railroad Company, praying an injunction restraining the latter company from constructing their road, &c.

The bill states that the former company was chartered in 1846; that the 19th section of the charter enacted: “That'when said corporation shall have procured the right of way as hereinbefore provided, they shall be seized in fee-simple of the right of such land, and they shall have the sole occupancy and use of the same, but not to interfere with the right of way of any…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. Water Works Co. v. BurkhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. City of Terre Haute v. Evansville & Terre Haute RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. CoburnIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Meyer v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Grand Rapids v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API