Legal Opinion
Conkey v. Reno
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided May 4, 1995No. CV-N-94-14-ECRPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
EDWARD C. REED, Jr., District Judge.
The federal officials/defendants, all represented by the United States Attorney, move the Court (Doc. #54) to dismiss plaintiffs’ second amended complaint. Although not specifically stated, the basis for the motion to dismiss is for lack of jurisdiction, failure to state a claim and qualified immunity. Plaintiffs oppose the motion to dismiss (Doc. # 58) and defendants reply (Doe. #61).
STANDARDS FOR GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS
A. Rule 12(b)(6) Failure to State a Claim
A court may grant a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim on which relief can be…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Conservation Force v. SalazarDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
- Impress Communications v. Unumprovident Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- Holliman v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1998
- Neal v. State of Oregon Sheriff's OfficeDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021