Legal Opinion

Marriage of Erickson v. Erickson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 6, 1990No. C9-89-1207PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARDEBRING, Judge.

On March 14, 1988, respondent Betty Erickson moved to enforce the parties’ March 1984 dissolution decree. The trial court assigned a fixed dollar amount to respondent’s lien on appellant DeWayne Erickson’s property, characterized the lien as a mortgage, imposed interest on the lien and awarded attorney fees to respondent. Appellant argues on appeal the trial court erred by improperly modifying the parties’ original March 1984 decree and by concluding he failed to make good faith and reasonable efforts to sell the property. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS

Thi…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marriage of Rutten v. RuttenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Mikkelsen v. MikkelsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  3. Marriage of Hanson v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Marriage of Smolecki v. SmoleckiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Marriage of Linder v. LinderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Redburn v. FerlittoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  2. Marriage of Sweere v. Gilbert-SweereCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Bakken v. HelgesonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  4. Katherina Theresa Bernhagen v. Peter John BernhagenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API