Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad v. City of Morehead

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 23, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge McCandless

Affirming.

The city of Morehead, a city of the fifth class, duly enacted an ordinance for the paving of certain streets at the expense of the abutting property owners, and let a contract therefor to Godfrey Miller. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad Company, as successor of the Elizabeth-town & Big Sandy Railway Company, owns about 815 feet abutting Railroad street, one of the streets to be improved, and which it claimed was exempt from assessment. The contractor being unwilling to proceed, the city filed action under the Declaratory Judgment Act (Civil Code…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Walker v. City of RichmondCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Southern Roads Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  3. Pennsylvania Fire Insurance v. CullinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  4. City of Mount Sterling v. JudyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  5. Coles v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kentucky Utilities Co. v. City of ParisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  2. City of Paducah v. Southern Roads Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. City of FrankfortCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API