Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Complaint of Twenty Grand Offshore, Inc., Etc. Twenty Grand Offshore, Inc. v. West India Carriers, Inc., Claimant-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 12, 1974No. 72-3314Published

1ConcurrenceGodbold, Circuit Judge

(specially concurring):

Because we struggle in this ease, as others have, to accommodate Bisso1 to the context in which towboat and barge seek to decide by contract who will bear the cost of insurance, it may be useful for me to state in a separate opinion my views and process of reasoning. If free to do so, I could with comfort hold that, at least absent monopolistic compulsion, towboat and towed vessel can bargain as they wish over both allocating the cost of insurance and concomitantly releasing from liability for negligence.2

But the fly in the ointment is Crescent Towing & Salvage Co. v.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Dixilyn Drilling Corp. v. Crescent Towing & Salvage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Great Lakes Transit Corp. v. Interstate Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Crescent Towing & Salvage Company v. Dixilyn Drilling CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API