Legal Opinion

Dixilyn Drilling Corp. v. Crescent Towing & Salvage Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 15, 1963No. 297PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent Crescent Towing Company contracted with petitioner Dixilyn Drilling Corporation to tow Dixilyn’s barge Julie Ann down the Mississippi River. While being towed, the barge collided with a bridge, and the bridge owners filed a libel in the United States District Court claiming damages from the tower and the barge owner. These two jointly paid the claim but continued to litigate, as between themselves, the question of which was liable. The district judge after a full trial found that the collision and the resulting damage were due solely to the negligence of the tower. He also rejected…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Southwestern Sugar & Molasses Co. v. River Terminals Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Boston Metals Co. v. the Winding GulfSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. In the Matter of the Complaint of Unterweser Reederei, Gmbh. Zapata Off-Shore Company v. M/s Bremen and Unterweser Reederei GmbhCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  3. Singletary v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Leidy v. Deseret Enterprises, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API