Clancy v. Booth & Flinn Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Trexler, P. J.,
This is a workman’s compensation case. Thomas Clancy, upon whose death the claim is founded, left home in apparently good health at seven o’clock in the morning and with other workmen began digging a ditch, and was exposed continuously to the rays of the sun upon what was the hottest day of the year, the thermometer registering 97 degrees. He was employed by Booth & Flinn Company who with the insurance carrier are the defendants. His regular quitting time was 5 -.30 P. M., but the job having been completed, the workmen were discharged earlier. There is some evidence…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Parks v. Miller Printing MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Loudon v. H. W. Shaull & SonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Trovato v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Consentino v. Union Paving Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Roland v. FrantzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.