Legal Opinion

Roland v. Frantz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 14, 1938No. Appeal, 45PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

This appeal in a workmen’s compensation case is from a judgment entered by the court below upon an award by the board.

Paul Boland, the deceased, 47 years of age, was a tinsmith. On July 18, 1935, from about 12 noon D. S. T., to 2 o’clock, he worked for his employers on the roof of a new school building in the city of Beading. From then until 4 P.M. he was engaged in installing an 18- or 20-inch ventilating pipe under and in close proximity to the roof in a space about 4-% feet high.

Henry E. Hathaway, the official in charge of the United States Weather Bureau in Beading,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lane v. Horn & Hardart Baking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. O'Neill v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. McFadden v. Lehigh Navigation Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Mooney v. YeagleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Pelusi v. MandesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Palermo v. North East Preserving Works, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Camili v. Penna. R.R. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Roland v. FrantzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Eckman v. U. S. Lock & Hardware Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Orlandini v. Volpe Coal CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API