Legal Opinion

Trovato v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 13, 1936No. Appeal, 56PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

For more than ten years prior to August 1, 1933, Ralph Trovato, claimant’s husband, had been employed in the boiler room of the W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Company. On that day he was promoted to the position of foreman of a shift which went on duty at three o’clock in the afternoon. Within half an hour after beginning work he suffered a heatstroke and was removed in an unconscious condition to Mt. Sinai Hospital where he died early the following morning.

The debatable question in the case is whether the heatstroke was attributable to the decedent’s exposure to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lacey v. Washburn & Williams Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Lane v. Horn & Hardart Baking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Consentino v. Union Paving Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Clancy v. Booth & Flinn Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Howey v. Peppard Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Parks v. Miller Printing MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Rettew v. GraybillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Toland v. Murphy Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Russell v. Scott Paper Co. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Loudon v. H. W. Shaull & SonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API