Legal Opinion

Succession of Lacosst

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 30, 1916No. 21853PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; Porter Parker, Judge. In the matter of the succession of Eugene Lacosst. Action by Mrs. Jeanne Lepine against Emile Pomes, testamentary executor, and others. Erom a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of the Case.

MONROE, C. J.

The decedent left an estate valued at over $187,000, and a last will whereby he bequeathed to his mother $1,000 and the usufruct, during her life, of the property No. 937 St. Louis street, and to different individuals and public institutions sums aggregating, say, $17,000, and other property, movable and immovable, and whereby he appointed Mr. Emile Pomes his executor, after which he made the following dispositions (adopting the translation from the French, in which language the will is written, furnished by the counsel) to wit:

“I want that, after all these…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Succession of BarkerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1855
  2. Valsain v. CloutierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1831
  3. Grubb's Heirs v. HendersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1833
  4. Maskell v. RousselSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1843

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Succession of LacosstSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  2. Beattie v. DimitrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  3. Succession of McMahonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API