Legal Opinion
Dixon v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 30, 2025No. 1:24-cv-04312Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, 97 Cr. 0498 (LAP); 24 Civ. 4312 (LAP) -against- ORDER DEMARK DIXON, Defendant. LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of Defendant DeMark Dixon’s pro se motion to set aside judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(2), (the “Rule 60 Motion”), and Defendant’s motion to unseal certain docket entries, (the “Unsealing Motion”).1 The 0F Government opposed the motions.2 For the reasons set out below, 1F Defendant’s motions are DENIED. I. Factual…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Roy William Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Woodrow Fleming v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Charmer Industries, Inc., and Peerless Importers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Maurice Carl Gitten v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Pena v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012