Legal Opinion
Pena v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 16, 2012No. Nos. 04 Civ. 9700(AJP), 00 Cr. 0036(RMB)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ANDREW J. PECK, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pro se petitioner Manuel Pena has petitioned pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) and 60(d) to reopen this Court’s May 2005 judgment dismissing his § 2255 habeas petition. (Dkt. No. 9 Notice of Motion; Dkt. No. 10: Pena Br.; Dkt. No. 16 Pena Reply Br.)1 Pena urges the Court to reopen his § 2255 proceeding due to “ ‘extraordinary circumstances,’ an undue hardship on petitioner, and because this case calls into question the correctness of this court’s decision related to counsel’s failure to either pursue a petition…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Roy William Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Prc Harris, Inc. v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Robert Rodriguez v. Robert Mitchell, Superintendent, Eastern Correctional Facility, and Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Paul Kellogg v. Wayne StrackCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dixon v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Jason Wimberly v. Melanie Stern, Spring Bank, Jay Lawrence Hack, Gallet, Dreyer & Berkey, LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026
- Joel Spigelman v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026
- Klein v. AicherDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Simpson v. GreeneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.