Legal Opinion
American Motorists Insurance v. United Furnace Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 14, 1988No. 88 CIV. 1238 (PKL)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge:
The plaintiff in this diversity action, American Motorists Insurance Company (“American Motorists” or the “insurance company”), is a surety company. Defendant, United Furnace Company, Inc. (“United”), operates a job shop and foundry in Michigan at which it performs a variety of machinery operations, and melts down scrap metal. American Motorists seeks to have United place it in funds, as collateral, to secure it against liability that it alleges it incurred by virtue of the writing of a Continuous Bond. American seeks this recovery under the terms of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Arnold Pross v. Curtis Katz, Roxann Management, Corp., and Jadam Equities, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- American Motorists Insurance Company v. United Furnace Co., Inc., F/k/a "United Foundry,"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- American Motorists Insurance v. VillanuevaUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989