Arthur J. Humphreys, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
DiCARLO, Judge:
Pursuant to Rule 59 of the Rules of this Court, defendant moves for rehearing of this Court’s decision in Arthur J. Humphreys, Inc. v. United States, 15 CIT-, 764 F.Supp. 188 (1991). The Court grants defendant’s motion for rehearing and finds the merchandise is not classifiable as hardboard, whether or not face finished, other. Accordingly, judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff.
BACKGROUND
The background to this case is set forth in the Court’s prior opinion. The Court found plaintiff had overcome the presumption of correctness in Customs’ classification and the merchandise…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Nippon Kogaku (USA), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Daw Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Asociacion Colombiana De Exportadores De Flores v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Asociacion Colombiana De Exportadores De Flores v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Asociacion Colombiana de Exportadores de Flores v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998