Legal Opinion

Chariton Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Lester

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 26, 1926PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stevens, j.

I Appellee, in October, 1919, entered into an oral contract with, appellant to install in his residence a heating and plumbing system, including' a fresh-water system. The purpose of the water system was to pump water to the bathroom, for the use of the bath and the toilet. The plant was installed, and has not been removed.

This is an action to recover the agreed price of the 'freshwater system. The defenses interposed were a total failure of consideration and a breach of warranty. The pumping device did not operate satisfactorily at any time. The rescission alleged occurred more…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. RedheadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. National Bank of Decorah v. RobisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  3. Rice v. Friend Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  4. Mattauch v. Riddell Automobile Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  5. Fulton Bank v. MathersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dailey v. Holiday Distributing CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  2. Miller v. Chatsworth Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  3. Brennan & Cohen v. Nolan Laundry Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  4. United States Hoffman MacHinery Corp. v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  5. Blecher v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API