Legal Opinion

Miller v. Chatsworth Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 15, 1927PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, J.

The logic and law of this case are found in the answers to these questions: First, was the defendant-bank the agent of the plaintiff in the instant transaction? Second, did the defendant-bank act contrary to and in violation of the directions given it by the plaintiff in the- investment of her money? Third, did the plaintiff, by her subsequent acts and conduct, ratify the transaction of negotiation and bargaining on the part of the defendant? •

The relation of agency is the consensual relation existing between two- persons by virtue of which one of them is to- aet for and on behalf of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kelley v. Newburyport & Amesbury Horse RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  2. Metcalf v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  3. Eau Claire Canning Co. v. Western Brokerage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Argus v. Ware & LelandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  5. National Improvement & Construction Co. v. MaikenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pillsbury Co. v. WardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  2. Abodeely v. CavrasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  3. Shannon v. GaarSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  4. Condor Petroleum Co. v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  5. Mountain States Waterbed Distributors, Inc. v. O.N.C. Freight Systems Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API