Miller v. Chatsworth Savings Bank
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, J.
The logic and law of this case are found in the answers to these questions: First, was the defendant-bank the agent of the plaintiff in the instant transaction? Second, did the defendant-bank act contrary to and in violation of the directions given it by the plaintiff in the- investment of her money? Third, did the plaintiff, by her subsequent acts and conduct, ratify the transaction of negotiation and bargaining on the part of the defendant? •
The relation of agency is the consensual relation existing between two- persons by virtue of which one of them is to- aet for and on behalf of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kelley v. Newburyport & Amesbury Horse RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
- Metcalf v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Eau Claire Canning Co. v. Western Brokerage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1905
- Argus v. Ware & LelandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- National Improvement & Construction Co. v. MaikenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Pillsbury Co. v. WardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- Abodeely v. CavrasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- Shannon v. GaarSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
- Condor Petroleum Co. v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Mountain States Waterbed Distributors, Inc. v. O.N.C. Freight Systems Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.