Legal Opinion

Redman v. United Fruit Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 1, 1950No. 21798_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.

The libellant sued to recover for injuries which he suffered on July 25, 1944, through the collapse of a wooden scaffold on the Steamship Leonatus. The suit was originally brought against the United States, the War Shipping Administration, the Danish Ship Operating Corporation, the Chelsea Ship Repair Company, respondents, and Robert Banks & Co., impleaded respondents. More than three years after the accident the Turbine Engineering Corporation and United Fruit Company were brought in as additional respondents.

Judge Bondy, who presided at the original trial,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Redman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  2. Redman v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Demetrios Larios v. Victory Carriers, Inc., and Alexander S. Onassis Corp., and Boyd, Weir & Sewell, Inc., and Cia, Salaminia De Naviera S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  2. Tucker v. National Linen Service Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  3. Mroz v. Dravo CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Dawson v. Fernley & EgerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1961
  5. Waterman Steamship Corp. v. Federico Marin Gutierrez, LibelantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API