Redman v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
BONDY, District Judge.
Courts of admiralty have long applied the Equity doctrine which demands that claims must be prosecuted within a reasonable time. While the determination of what is a reasonable time under the circumstances is left to the discretion of the court, analogous State statutes of limitation are, in the absence of special circumstances, held controlling. Marshall v. International Mercantile Marine Co., 2 Cir., 39 F. 2d 551; The Sydfold, 2 Cir., 86 F.2d 611; Hughes v. Roosevelt, 2 Cir., 107 F.2d 901; Schiavone-Bonomo Corporation v. Buffalo Barge Towing Corp., 2 Cir., 132 F.2d 766.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hayes v. Port of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Livingston & Gilchrist v. Maryland InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Marshall v. International Mercantile Marine Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- McGrath v. Panama R.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1924
- The SydfoldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Redman v. United Fruit Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Cederholm v. Sidermar, S. P. A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967