Legal Opinion

Bai v. Reubart

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided May 25, 2021No. 2:19-cv-00739Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 XIAOYE BAI, Case No.: 2:19-cv-00739-GMN-NJK 8 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 9 v. 10 REUBART, et al., [Docket No. 63] 11 Defendant(s). 12 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the orders denying his 13 request for appointment of counsel. Docket No. 63.1 Defendants filed a response in opposition. 14 Docket No. 65. Plaintiff filed a reply. Docket No. 66. The motion is properly resolved without a 15 hearing. See Local Rule 78-1. For the reasons stated below, the motion is hereby DENIED. 16 Motions for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Frederick C. Wilborn v. Antonio Escalderon and Ruth RushenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Palmer v. ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Cardoza v. Bloomin' Brands, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2015
  4. Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. KXD Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API