Legal Opinion
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. KXD Technology, Inc.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided August 15, 2007No. Nos. 2:05-cv-01532-RLH-GWF, 2:06-cv-00101-RLH-GWFPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HUNT, Chief District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Shanghai Hongsheng Technology Co., Ltd.’s (“Shanghai”) Motion to Reconsider the Denial of its Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default and Motion to Quash for Insufficiency of Service of Process (#629) (the “Motion”), filed May 9, 2007. The Court has also considered Plaintiffs Opposition (#641), filed May 29, 2007, and Defendant’s Reply (# 649), filed June 12, 2007. On July 3, 2007, Defendant filed a Supplement to the Motion (# 665). On August 9, 2007, Defendant filed a Second Supplement to the Motion (# 687).
Also before the Court is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Noel Mason v. Genisco Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Charles R. Veeck v. Commodity Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
3Cited by24 opinions
- Anthony Posey v. Facebook.com, et al.District Court, D. Nevada · 2026
- Arvin Cruz Solangon v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2026
- Bai v. ReubartDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021
- Bai v. ReubartDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021
- Bracho v. Las Vegas Justice CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.