Legal Opinion

Nolan v. Otney

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 9, 1907No. 14,896PublishedCited by 37 opinions

.Error from Washington district court; William T. Dillon, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

.The opinion of the court was delivered by

MASON, J.:

Martin Dolan executed an instrument purporting to be a warranty deed conveying property to Joseph Otney, but containing these words immedi*312ately following the granting clause, which was in the usual form:

“This deed is made with the understanding that the same is not to take effect or be in force until the death of the grantor, and upon the death of the grantor is to take effect and at said time to vest in the said grantee the absolute title in fee simple of the property above described.
“And it is further understood that the said Joseph Otney…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Uhl v. Ohio River RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Taft v. TaftMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Durand v. HigginsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  4. Hunt v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  5. Davis v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Couch v. HooverCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934
  2. Shaffer v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Williams v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Brady v. FullerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  5. De Bow v. WollenbergOregon Supreme Court · 1908

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API