Legal Opinion
Augspurger v. Hudson
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 30, 2004No. 49A04-0111-CV-514Published
1Opinion of the Court
802 N.E.2d 503 (2004)
Gilbert Randall AUGSPURGER, Appellant-Respondent,
v.
Julie E. HUDSON, Appellee-Petitioner.
No. 49A04-0111-CV-514.
Court of Appeals of Indiana.
January 30, 2004.
Denise F. Hayden, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellant.
Sherwood P. Hill, Clinton E. Blanck, Maurer Rifkin & Hill, P.C., Carmel, IN, Attorneys for Appellee.
OPINION
FRIEDLANDER, Judge.
The trial court entered a Decree of Dissolution (the Decree) on February 14, 2001, dissolving the marriage between Gilbert Randall Augspurger (Husband) and Julie Hudson (Wife). Pursuant to the Decree, Wife was awarded 90% of the marital…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Perez v. United States Steel Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1981
- Fobar v. VonderaheIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Coster v. CosterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Augspurger v. HudsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.