Augspurger v. Hudson
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRIEDLANDER, Judge.
The trial court entered a Decree of Dissolution (the Decree) on February 14, 2001, dissolving the marriage between Gilbert Randall Augspurger (Husband) and Julie Hudson (Wife). Pursuant to the Decree, Wife was awarded 90% of the marital estate, spousal maintenance in the amount of $421.07 per week, and $21,000 for future medical treatment of her physical and mental incapacity. The court further determined that Husband should pay a portion of Wife's attorney fees, an amount to be determined at a future hearing. Thereafter, Husband filed a Motion to Correct Error,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Fobar v. VonderaheIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Coster v. CosterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Pactor v. PactorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Cannon v. CannonIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bowyer v. Indiana Department of Natural ResourcesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Garriott v. PetersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Matzat v. MatzatIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Pala v. LoubserIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Filter Specialists, Inc. v. BrooksIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.