Legal Opinion

Lane v. Fitzsimmons Stores Ltd.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 2, 1945No. Civil Actions Nos. 3030, 3056, 3073, 3682, 3689, 3690, 3705PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McCOLLOCH, District Judge.

In an age when punitive damages and informer recoveries are being re-examined,1 a construction of a statute that permits an overcharge of less than five dollars to be converted into a claim for more than ten thousand dollars calls for serious consideration. It may be said that Congress made the law, and the Court’s duty is to enforce it, but the question remains: Did Congress intend such a result?2 A great scholar when called from the courts of New York to the Supreme Court of the United States, declared that his new duties consisted largely of interpreting acts of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Casey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. United States v. Sing Tuck or King Do & Thirty-OneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Porter v. ColeDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API