Legal Opinion

Porter v. Cole

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided June 10, 1946No. Civil Action No. 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATWELL, District Judge.

Plaintiff claims that the defendant violated the OPA statute and regulations by requiring a purchaser who desired bonded whiskey to purchase another item at the same time. That the statutory warning notice was given to the defendant. He prays that the defendant’s license to sell *12intoxicants be cancelled, that injunctive relief be granted, and that he recover treble damages.

The testimony shows that the defendant conducted five liquor stores, three in Dallas and two in Perry, Texas. That his Dallas sales aggregated $683,800 in thé year 1945. That during that period his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. M. Kraus & Bros., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. M. Kraus & Bros.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  3. Bowles v. L. D. McClean Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1945
  4. Lane v. Fitzsimmons Stores Ltd.District Court, S.D. California · 1945

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Anchor Liquor Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  2. Lessin v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API