Legal Opinion
Wunderlich v. Netherlands Insurance Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 19, 1954PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447 to remand this action to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, from whence it was removed on the joint petition of all defendants.
Plaintiff seeks to recover damages for breach of three separate policies of marine insurance issued on a sea-going vessel, under which each of the six defendants assumed a fractional share of liability. The assured vessel was en rouj;e from Belize, Honduras, to Galveston,. Texas when the alleged damage occurred.
The complaint asserts a separate cause of action against each defendant which in…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Chelentis v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Insurance Co. v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- The Moses TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kathleen Troupe v. Chicago, Duluth & Georgian Bay Transit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Crispin Company v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1955
- Orient Overseas Line v. Globemaster Baltimore, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Fraser v. Astra Steamship Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- JJ Ryan & Sons, Inc. v. Continental Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.