Legal Opinion

In Re Marcus

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 21, 1936No. Crim. 327PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

The petitioner seeks his release from custody on a writ of habeas corpus. He was charged with the commission of three separate felonies and pleaded guilty to each charge. His application for probation was granted, the same to run concurrently on all three charges, and he was placed on probation for three years beginning August 16, 1935, with the condition that the first sixty days of that period be spent in the county jail of San Diego County. On September 27, 1935, a so-called modified order was entered by the court purporting to modify the original order granting probation by requiring him…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SizeloveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. People v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. In Re GlickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. In re HazlettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. People v. McCleanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Andersen v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. American Telephone and Telegraph Company v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, Data Transmission Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  5. Paoli v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API