Legal Opinion

In re Hazlett

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 9, 1934No. Crim. No. 1796PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus. After being served with process William J. Fitzgerald, sheriff of the city and county of San Francisco, made a return on the writ in which he set forth the commitment under which he holds the petitioner. That commitment is in words and figures as follows:

“This cause came on regularly this day for judgment.
“The district attorney, Matthew Brady, by Harmon D. Skillen, assistant district attorney, with the defendant George Hazlett and his counsel Charles Taylor, came into court: The defendant George Hazlett was duly informed by the court of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte SizeloveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. Lewis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  3. In Re MarcusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API