Legal Opinion

Grieco v. Zoning Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 6, 1993No. CV 91-306827PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.

The motion of the plaintiff Thomas Grieco for permission to file a petition for certification to review the Appellate Court’s denial of a petition for certification is denied pursuant to Ingersoll v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 194 Conn. 277, 479 A.2d 1207 (1984).

The jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is defined by statute. See State v. Curcio, 191 Conn. 27, 30, 463 A.2d 566 (1983), and the cases cited therein.1 The applicable statute, General Statutes § 51-197f, limits our review of decisions of the Appellate Court to those that constitute a “final determination of any appeal.” State v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. State v. AyalaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. Phelps Dodge Copper Products Co. v. GroppoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank v. GarofaloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. State v. ChisholmSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Simms v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Ambroise v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Waterbury Teachers Ass'n v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. Potvin v. Lincoln Service & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API