Legal Opinion

State v. Greene

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 3, 1979No. 6PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Justice Brock was absent on account of illness and did not participate in the consideration and decision of this case. The remaining six justices are equally divided as to whether the trial court prejudicially erred in refusing to excuse juror Raymond Simmons for cause, thus forcing defendant to use a peremptory challenge to remove him. In accordance with the usual practice and long established rule, this equal division requires that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed without becoming a precedent. Mortgage Co. v. Real Estate, Inc., 297 N.C. 696, 256 S.E. 2d 688 (1979); Townsend v.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wachovia Mortgage Co. v. Autry-Barker-Spurrier Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Townsend v. Norfolk & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. James v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Sharpe v. PughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. CommScope Credit Union v. Butler & Burke, LLPSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  2. Piro v. McKeeverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  3. Greenhill v. CrabtreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011
  5. Greenhill v. CrabtreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API