City of Carlsbad v. RUDVALIS
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’ROURKE, J.
In consolidated eminent domain actions brought by the City of Carlsbad (the City), the City appeals from a portion of a judgment in favor of defendants Joseph A. Rudvalis and Barbara G. Rudvalis (collectively Rudvalis) as trustees of the Joseph and Barbara Rudvalis Family Trust UDT 6/7/89 and Pamela Koide. Both Rudvalis and Koide own commercial nurseries. Among other damages, the jury awarded defendants severance damages consisting of diminution in value of nursery improvements and personal property on the theory the City’s project, a road extension, accelerated residential…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Nally v. Grace Community ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of San Diego v. D.R. Horton San Diego Holding Co.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- City of San Diego v. BARRATT AMERICAN INC.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Redevelopment Agency v. AttishaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005