Legal Opinion
City of San Diego v. BARRATT AMERICAN INC.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 25, 2005No. D044079PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McDONALD, J.
In this eminent domain action plaintiff the City of San Diego (City) condemned 5.04 acres of real property (the taken property) within the North City Future Urbanizing Area (NCFUA) to construct the middle segment of the State Route 56 freeway (the Project), an east-west freeway that traverses the NCFUA. The taken property was part of a 38.47-acre parcel of property owned by defendants Barratt American Incorporated and others (Owners). The central issue below was how to value the taken property disregarding the influence of the Project on the value, as required by Code of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Henderson v. Harnischfeger Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Leonardini v. Shell Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Merced Irrigation District v. WoolstenhulmeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Perris v. StamperCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- Metropolitan Water District v. Campus Crusade for Christ, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
- City of Santa Clarita v. NTS Technical SystemsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency v. Dhaliwal CA3California Court of Appeal · 2015
- City of Perris v. StamperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.