De Soto Falls Development Co. v. Libby
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Justice.
Inadequacy of a remedy at law is the foundation stone upon which equity jurisprudence rests (Price v. Hall, 226 Ala. 372, 147 So. 156; Samples v. Grizzell, 230 Ala. 176, 160 So. 538; Bullard Shoals Mining Co. v. Spencer, 208 Ala. 663, 95 So. 1), and, where the wrong can be compensated in money, and the action at law affords adequate remedy, equity will not take jurisdiction without some independent matter of equitable cognizance (Hunt v. Jones, 203 Ala. 541, 84 So. 718; City of Tuscaloosa v. Williams, 229 Ala. 542, 158 So. 753).
Reduced to the last analysis, the bill in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gilmer v. Mobile & Montgomery Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Bullard Shoals Mining Co. v. SpencerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Mobile & Montgomery Railway Co. v. GilmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Hunt v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Myles v. StrangeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sherrill v. Federal Land Bank of New Orleans, La.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Lovoy v. RatliffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Lane v. Roma Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Hyde v. BainsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945