Lane v. Roma Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
To make a valid sale of the property of the taxpayer for delinquent taxes, every substantial requirement of law must be followed by the authorities. Greil Bros. Co. v. Montgomery, 182 Ala. 291, 62 So. 692, Ann.Cas.1915D, 738; Johnson v. Harper, 107 Ala. 706-708, 18 So. 198.
The tax collector, empowered to levy upon and sell personal property, pursuant to Code, § 3060, is authorized to sell only so much as is necessary to “satisfy the taxes, fees and expenses of sale.”
When a levy is made upon several distinct parcels or units of personal property, and' advertised as such,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Yauger v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Greil Bros. v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Warr v. Collector of TaxesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Hunt v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Johnson v. HarperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Huntsville v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Pritchett v. WadeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- McNulty v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- City of Huntsville v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Pung v. Isabella CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2026