Legal Opinion

Daniel v. Hamilton

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1953No. 7369PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SATHRE, Judge.

These cases are here on appeal by the defendants from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs rendered by the district court of Williams County, North Dakota. Both cases grew out of the same facts and the defendants are the same in both. It was agreed therefore by the respective parties and their attorneys to consolidate the cases and try them together. For the- purpose of this opinion the case of J. H. Daniel and Rose Daniel will be referred to as case No. 1, and the case of F. B. Daniel and Mary V. Daniel will be referred to as case No. 2. The actions were brought for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Udgaard v. SchindlerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Crocker Chair Co. v. Edward Hines Hardwood & Hemlock Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dangerfield v. MarkelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Fedorenko v. RudmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  3. First National Bank, Bismarck v. O'CALLAGHANNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Trauger v. Helm Bros., Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Fiebiger v. FischerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API