Fedorenko v. Rudman
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, .'Judge.
On October 30, 1952, the plaintiffs commenced an. action against the defendant, praying for a reconveyance of ,%6ths of the minerals granted by them to him by a mineral deed dated July 22, 1949, and covering and describing:
The South Half of the Northwest Quarter (S¡^NW%), and Lots 3 and 4, Section 1, Township 149 North, Range 78 West of the 5th P.M., arid the East Half of the Southeast Quarter (E^SE^t) of Section 35, Township 150 North, Range 78 West of-the 5th P.M., McLean County, North Dakota,
of which the plaintiff, Phillip Fedorenko, was the title owner.
The mineral deed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bostwick v. Mutual Life Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Dixon v. KaufmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
- Marten v. Paul O. Burns Wine Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Butler Manufacturing Co. v. Elliott & CoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- Gunsch v. GunschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Adams v. Little Missouri Minerals AssociationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- Beatty v. DepueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
- Nielsen v. McCabeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Schmidt v. Grand Forks Country ClubNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Volk v. VolkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.