Legal Opinion

Fedorenko v. Rudman

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1955No. 7495PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, .'Judge.

On October 30, 1952, the plaintiffs commenced an. action against the defendant, praying for a reconveyance of ,%6ths of the minerals granted by them to him by a mineral deed dated July 22, 1949, and covering and describing:

The South Half of the Northwest Quarter (S¡^NW%), and Lots 3 and 4, Section 1, Township 149 North, Range 78 West of the 5th P.M., arid the East Half of the Southeast Quarter (E^SE^t) of Section 35, Township 150 North, Range 78 West of-the 5th P.M., McLean County, North Dakota,

of which the plaintiff, Phillip Fedorenko, was the title owner.

The mineral deed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bostwick v. Mutual Life Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Dixon v. KaufmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Marten v. Paul O. Burns Wine Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Butler Manufacturing Co. v. Elliott & CoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  5. Gunsch v. GunschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Adams v. Little Missouri Minerals AssociationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Beatty v. DepueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Nielsen v. McCabeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Schmidt v. Grand Forks Country ClubNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Volk v. VolkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API