Legal Opinion

First National Bank, Bismarck v. O'CALLAGHAN

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1966No. 8287PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUTZ, Judge.

The defendants, for several years, have been customers of Universal Motor Company of Bismark, now known as McCamey Ford. They purchased a number of cars from this concern. One such purchase was made on June 14,1961, when-they purchased a used Falcon on conditional sales contract. Thereafter, on August 4, 1961, the .parties desired to purchase a new. 1961 Falcon. They thereupon executed a new conditional sales contract but, at the time it was signed, its terms were only partially filled out. One provision that was blank at the time of the execution of the August 4 contract was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hanes v. MitchellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Ives v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Daniel v. HamiltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Sidwell Oil & Gas Co. v. LoydSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  2. North Dakota Public Service Commission v. Valley Farmers Bean Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Moen v. ThomasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Jerry Harmon Motors, Inc. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Collection Center, Inc. v. BydalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API