Legal Opinion

Beard v. Williams County Department of Social Services

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1984No. 83-1436PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

A writ of habeas corpus will lie in child custody matters if the custody order in dispute was entered by a court without jurisdiction, thus being void ab initio. See In re Frinzl (1949), 152 Ohio St. 164 [39 O.O. 456]; Reynolds v. Ross Cty. Children’s Services Agency (1983), 5 Ohio St. 3d 27.

Appellant argues that she was entitled to counsel at all meaningful stages of the neglect proceedings and, therefore, the failure to provide her with counsel during the proceedings to obtain temporary custody renders those orders void. There is no constitutional requirement that appellant be afforded…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. State ex rel. Heller v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. In re HuntOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. In Re FrinzlOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  5. In re PiazzaOhio Supreme Court · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Howard v. Catholic Social Services of Cuyahoga County, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Asberry v. PayneOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Jones v. Lucas County Children Services BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Howard v. Catholic Social Serv. of Cuyahoga Cty., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. McGinty v. Jewish Children's BureauOhio Supreme Court · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API