Legal Opinion

Clarence Everett Wilkerson v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 2, 1965No. 17837_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOGEL, Circuit Judge.

Clarence Everett Wilkerson (referred to as the defendant herein), having been convicted by a jury of a violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2421, commonly known as the “Mann Act”, appeals to this court, asking that his conviction be reversed and the case remanded. The charging portion of the indictment returned by the grand jury alleged:

“That on or about the 17th day of March, 1964, CLARENCE EVERETT WILKERSON did knowingly transport in interstate commerce, by means of an automobile, certain women, to-wit, Beverly Mae Wilson, Mary Jean Stone, and Earnestine Brady, from the City of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Hawkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. United States v. PapeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  4. Wyatt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Neff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Cleo BurgardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  2. United States v. Emerson David Redstone, United States of America v. Dale RedstoneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  3. Churder v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1968
  4. Kenneth Gene Grulkey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  5. State v. ManningMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API