Legal Opinion

United States v. Pape

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 21, 1944No. 385PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge.

Pape appeals from a judgment of conviction under an indictment for transporting a woman in interstate commerce “for the purpose of prostitution, debauchery and other immoral purposes.” He raises the following objections: (1) That statements were admitted against him at his trial, made by him to an officer in the Federal Bureau of Investigation after his arrest and before he was arraigned. (Since the delay was of only a few hours and no duress was involved, the point has now been answered by the decision of the Supreme Court in United States v. Mitchell, 322 U.S. 65, 64…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Chirac v. ReinickerSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  4. Bracey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  5. United States v. FeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Edward E. Colton and Lillian Kaltman v. United States of America, United States of America v. Edward E. ColtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  2. Baird v. KoernerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  3. United States v. Antonelli Fireworks Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  4. United States v. Hyman Harvey Klein, Maurice Haas, and Morris O. AlprinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  5. In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API